Facebook confusion

A friend on Facebook posted a "Nazis suck.  Live nazis suck.  Dead Nazis suck" type of post, and said it was likely to be deleted for violation of TOS.

Actually, I think he's wrong, but we will wait to see if his prognostication comes to pass.

I said that he wasn't advocating violence (rioting), or hate groups (Nazis), nor was he advocating murder, so it didn't violate TOS (IMO).  Of course, I can't speak for FB.

Then , someone brought up the fact that NAZI means NATIONAL SOCIALIST.  (Take a look at that term.)  It's not Nationalism.  It's not Socialism. 

My statement, below, I suspect he'll remove because it disagrees with him.  But we shall see.

Honestly, I don't believe that they have removed posts that say something sucks.

If you were calling for murder, however, THAT would be removed (Or ought to be!), as it advocates violence, hatred and murder!

Arjun made a statement that many people seem to ignore -- that NAZI is short for NATIONAL SOCIALIST.

Let's look at that again. It's not Nationalism. And it's not Socialism. It when the two are combined, and and a Dose (and an unhealthy dose, at that) of more hatred is thrown in.

Socialism is the enemy of capitalism. It's not even political, it's ECONOMIC.

It's actually based on hatred-- hatred of the rich. It's also based in Covetousness. Remember? "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, or manservant, or maidservant, or anything that is thy neighbor's." People ignore that, too.

Yeshua had harsh words for bankers. He had harsh words for the rich. But he ALSO defended their right to be rich. ("Friend, I have done you no wrong. Did you not agree to work this day for a denarius? I choose to give to the last what I have given to you. Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with my own? Or is your eye evil because I am good?" (Do you begrudge my generosity?)

It's true: Nazis do not have a place in a world which is supposed to be based in love.

You're quite right in saying "NAZIS SUCK."

But, IMO, you're not in violation of anything. You've told the truth.

George Orwell stated it correctly: "In time of universal deception, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

-----------------------------

Will my comment be removed? Will he, while claiming to espouse freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, censor my comment? ONLY TIME WILL TELL. And THAT is the situation...AS I SEE IT!

Caution -- Likely to be censored at FB. Redux #2

Only conservatives have "Offensive" opinions, at least according to the Demonrats. (Yes, I said DEMON-RATS)
And yet, they ignore the fact that the KKK was founded by a Democrat. The ignore the fact that Stalin, Castro, Mao, and Hitler killed MILLIONS...
They ignore that fact that Nazis are SOCIALISTS (It's in the name -- And look for the "We are Socialists" memes... it's misattributed to Hitler)
They ignore the fact that appeasement doesn't work. They ignore the fact that people are crossing the country's borders illegally. They ignore the fact that the "Religion of Peace" is running around beheading people. They ignore the lesson of Sodom. They support Genocide in the murder of babies...

How long before this post is removed by a Facebook censor? How long before one of the "Tolerant Generation" is offended?

Honestly, how long before the asses at FB decide to censor me?  I don't know.  But I know that the Libtards are there...and they, like big brother, watch...

Snow Flakes attempt to shame... One word for that...

If on Twitter, the term #Instablock has meaning.  Fast, effective way of blocking the morons who attempt to shame constantly.

I know a little snowflake... Yeah, one of THOSE... Disagree, even civilly, your post is removed. 
Post nothing but facts, Offended.  I had such a one regarding causes of death... Guns, in a specific year, 31000.  Auto accidents, same year, 35000.  Drug abuse, 90K... 
Abortion:  1 MILLION PLUS... I showed that the biggest causes of death combined were still outnumbered by 3 to 1 by abortion. 

I had a post showing all the dictators who had taken away firearms... And one who was trying to do so.  And that little snowflake took offense there. 

I left a holiday greeting, and got bitched at.
I left a birthday greeting and got bitched at.

Sent someone else a birth greetings and same result from the same person. SNOWFLAKE!


That's the "TOLERANT LEFT."

While I MAY have exercised poor judgement in my most recent greeting, it's no reason to go trying to shame me in front of family.  IT DOESN'T WORK.  DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT??

Self-important, "Tolerant", Easily offended SNOWFLAKE.

No sense praying for a change of heart for this person.  Not sure that the person even has one!

It seems that this poor, liberal snowflake has nothing better to do than gripe at someone who's not a liberal.  Sick.  Pathetic.  Downright nasty.

My only suggestion?  GROW UP!  Stop being such a self-important, censoring SNOB.

Blocking may be my only option.  But I won't take bullying from a half-witted snowflake!

STUFF IT.  SMD, GTH and GR.
FOAD!

I may not be right... but I STICK BY MY PRINCIPLES.  You don't like it?  LEAVE.

Eye on the Sith

Today's number, if you are still keeping track, is 19250. I'll be stopping the countdown shortly unless I get some guesses. I really don't care.

In Episode II of Star Wars, the Emperor received emergency powers to deal with the Threat posed by Count Dooku and the separatists. He declared war, built an army that had actually started 10 years earlier, and began to tear down the constitution of the Republic. There were spies, secret deals, censorship, and more. It resulted, as you may remember, in a civil war. The war, of course, was ultimately won by the rebels, the Alliance to Restore the Republic.

I'm not one to buy every cock and bull story that comes down the pipe. I check 'em out, and most of the time these rumors are false, just plain bullsh*t.

Today, I got wind of a bill supposedly before the Senate -- S. 773. According to what I was reading, it would give the President the power to shut down the internet, or severely limit its scope in an emergency. I had my doubts, and did the research. What I found was a 55 page bill. (Small, as compared to the Obamacare bill, which is 1000 pages long).
I began to read. And what I found is frightening.

The President would be given the power to declare a cyber-emergency. He would be able to shut down, or severely limit the scope of the net. It gives a handful of people a huge say in security, and what would have to be done to protect the citizens of the US.

What frightens me is that there are no defining terms as to what would constitute a "Cyber-emergency." He could shut it down during the next election, claiming a national emergency. It would effectively impair our ability to make payments on the web, find information, determine what is going on in the world.

What frightens me is that there are no "Checks" on the power as the bill is written. The President would control from when he declared the emergency to when he decides it ends. There seems to be no power delegated to congress, except to hear the story every four years as to what should be done, and enact appropriate legislation.

What frightens me is the obvious censorship, silencing of conservative blogs, the NRA, Rush, and anti-queer groups, not to mention the hundreds of other conservative causes such as the National Tax Payers Union, AARP, and such groups that support the right to life.

I URGE each and every one of you to check out S. 773 on the web (While you still have a chance) and decide if you want to give up your computer, or your right to information that should be freely available.

Obama, and the Communist parties of this country -- the anti-Christian wings of the left, the baby killers...-- they're out to take away the right to speak your mind. You jackasses have been accusing the GOP of wanting to do the same. No matter WHO is doing it, it's STILL WRONG.

SPEAK UP. Write to your Senators. Tell them to VOTE DOWN S. 773, the so-called "Cyber-security act of 2009," or to amend it so our rights to free speech is protected. Tell them to DEFINE a cyber-emergency, specify a period of time that one can be in effect, and install checks and balances on the power being given.

It's YOUR internet. Not the Government's! And it's worrisome that they are trying to take it away... AS I SEE IT.